<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deep Ad Thoughts &#187; AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/tag/att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog</link>
	<description>Advertising and marketing in Maryland and DC by The Cyphers Agency.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T vs. Verizon &#8211; Network Advertising Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/2009/11/25/att-vs-verizon-network-advertising-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/2009/11/25/att-vs-verizon-network-advertising-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Krebs-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verizon has more 3g coverage. AT&#38;T&#8217;s 3g coverage is faster. At least that&#8217;s what they say. Both have undertaken recent advertising blitzes to highlight their respective benefits. Verizon started it all with the “there’s a map for that” spot, which you can see below (intentionally sounding like the “there’s an app for that” spots from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_jade" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fwww.thecyphersagency.com%252Fblog%252F2009%252F11%252F25%252Fatt-vs-verizon-network-advertising-battle%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22AT%26T%20vs.%20Verizon%20-%20Network%20Advertising%20Battle%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Verizon has more 3g coverage. AT&amp;T&#8217;s 3g coverage is faster. At least that&#8217;s what <em>they</em> say. Both have undertaken recent advertising blitzes to highlight their respective benefits.</p>
<p>Verizon started it all with the “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECF-tBIK6pw">there’s a map for that</a>” spot, which you can see below (intentionally sounding like the “there’s an app for that” spots from Apple/AT&amp;T).  <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/18/att-loses-verizon-lawsuit/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T sued Verizon, and lost</a>. Now AT&amp;T is coming out with spots featuring Luke Wilson talking about the best 3G coverage, to combat Verizon’s spots that show AT&amp;T with inferior network coverage.</p>
<p>Our thoughts are that AT&amp;T has their work cut out for themselves, in that their position has been lacking for a long time. Verizon has been using the “It’s the Network” USP for years. The brand icon of the dude that says “can you hear me now?” is ingrained in consumers minds (well, <em>our</em> minds anyway).</p>
<p>AT&amp;T has had a huge boost with the iPhone and has latched onto “The best 3G experience” as their message. But <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10401289-94.html">is it enough</a> considering Verizon has branded itself as the superior network coverage provider for years? There will still be plenty of people who don’t care about the network because they just want an iPhone and right now, and the iPhone is only available through AT&amp;T. But Verizon is working to get the iPhone too; what happens when you can get it through both providers? Will Verizon’s years of investment in branding pay off?</p>
<p>A couple of commercials are linked below &#8211; what do you think?</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ECF-tBIK6pw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ECF-tBIK6pw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IioSntkD8lE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IioSntkD8lE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div class="plus-one-wrap"><g:plusone href="http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/2009/11/25/att-vs-verizon-network-advertising-battle/"></g:plusone></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecyphersagency.com/blog/2009/11/25/att-vs-verizon-network-advertising-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

